Betekenis van:
final judgment

Voorbeeldzinnen

1. The judgment became final on (give date: dd-mm-yyyy): …
2. The judgment became final on (date: DD-MM-YYYY):
3. The court which delivered the judgment imposing the sentence that became final:
4. The execution of the judgment started on (if different from the date on which the judgment became final) (date: DD-MM-YYYY):
5. ‘probation decision’ shall mean a judgment or a final decision of a competent authority of the issuing State taken on the basis of such judgment:
6. of the final decision to recognise the judgment and enforce the sentence together with the date of the decision;
7. Where a Community trade mark court has given a judgment which has become final on a counterclaim for revocation or for invalidity of a Community trade mark, a copy of the judgment shall be sent to the Office.
8. It shall not resume them prior to the entry in the same Register of the final judgment upon, or any other termination of, such action.
9. final judgment has already been passed in respect of the same actions on such persons by the competent authorities of the requested Member State.
10. the final decision to recognise the judgment and, where applicable, the probation decision and to assume responsibility for supervising the probation measures or alternative sanctions;
11. ‘judgment’ shall mean a final decision or order of a court of the issuing State, establishing that a natural person has committed a criminal offence and imposing:
12. ‘judgment’ shall mean a final decision or order of a court of the issuing State imposing a sentence on a natural person;
13. Where the member of staff is prosecuted for those same acts, a final decision shall be taken only after a final judgment has been handed down by the court hearing the case.
14. Any candidate or tenderer which has been the subject of a conviction by final judgment of which the contracting authority/entity is aware, for one or more of the reasons listed below, shall be excluded from participation in a contract:
15. In consequence of the judgment of 19 October 2000 the formal investigation procedure initiated by the decision of 24 June 1996 has been reopened. The Commission must therefore adopt a new final decision.